In Emerson’s second poll of the Iowa caucus, former Vice President Joe Biden narrowly leads the Democratic field with 25%, followed by Vermont Senator Bernie Sanders at 24%. Mayor Pete Buttigieg of South Bend, Indiana has surged to 11%. Senator Kamala Harris of California follows with 10% – the only other candidate to clear double digits in Iowa. Data was collected between March 21-24, and the Democratic caucus ballot test had a margin of error +/- 6.2%

Spencer Kimball, Director of the Emerson Poll concludes that “the biggest surprise in this poll is Mayor Pete, last week we saw him inching up in our national poll, and now he’s in double digits in Iowa, America is going to be asking who is ‘Mayor Pete’?” In Emerson’s January Iowa poll, prior to many candidates’ announcements, Biden led with 29%, followed by Harris,who had made her announcement just prior to the poll, at 18%, and Sanders, who had not yet formally declared, at 15%. Mayor Pete Buttigieg was polling at 0%. 

Sanders maintains a lead among 18-29 year olds with 44%, followed by Buttigieg with 22%. Biden leads among all other age groups with 32% support among 30-49 year olds, 29% among 50-64 year olds, and 31% among those 65 years or older. Kimball notes that, “If Buttigieg is able to maintain his momentum, his candidacy appears to be pulling from the same demographic of young voters as Sanders, and that could become a problem for Sanders.”

Among those who supported Hillary Clinton in the 2016 Iowa caucus, Biden leads with 29%, followed by Sanders with 17%, and Buttigieg and Elizabeth Warren with 15%. Of those who supported Sanders in 2016 – 36% still support him, 24% support Biden, 12% support Harris, and 8% support Buttigieg.

President Trump is in a comfortable position for re-election as the Republican party’s nominee in Iowa, with 90% of voters indicating that they would support him over former Massachusetts Governor Bill Weld, who received 10%. In a head-to-head matchup between President Trump and Michael Bloomberg, President Trump had a larger lead of 92% to 7% among Republican caucus-goers. (sample size n=207, +/-6.9%). However, Trump’s approval in the state has worsened to 42% approve/51% disapprove in comparison to Emerson’s February poll that had 46% approve/48% disapprove.

General Election

When looking at potential general election matchups, all are within margin of error, except for Trump against Harris, where the President leads 54% to 46% to Harris. Sanders and Biden are the only Democratic contenders in Iowa to receive more support than the President; Biden has a 6 point advantage, and Sanders has a 2 point advantage. (sample size n=707, +/-3.6%)

  • Donald Trump 47% Joe Biden 53%
  • Donald Trump 49% Bernie Sanders 51%
  • Donald Trump 51% Elizabeth Warren 49%
  • Donald Trump 52% Cory Booker 48%
  • Donald Trump 54% Kamala Harris 46%

When Howard Schultz was added to a general election matchup between Elizabeth Warren and Donald Trump in Iowa, both President Trump and Senator Warren dropped 3% — Schultz received 7%, Trump 48%, and Warren 45%. When asked if respondents would support Donald Trump, Bernie Sanders, or Howard Schultz, Sanders loses his lead in the general with 47% supporting President Trump, 45% supporting Senator Sanders, and 8% supporting Howard Schultz.

Ideal candidate questions:

  • A plurality of voters (45%) believe their ideal candidate should have held prior office. 30% of voters have no strong opinion on this requirement, and 25% believe  their ideal candidate should not have held prior office. This data suggests that 2020 is not the year for an “outsider”.
  • A majority of voters (65%) “somewhat” or “strongly” believe their ideal candidate should have an aggressive style of leadership. This sentiment is bipartisan, with 85% of Republican voters and 53% of Democrats opting for aggressive leadership. 13% of voters somewhat or strongly disagreed that their ideal candidate would be an aggressive leader; 22% had no strong preference.
  • A strong majority of voters (68%) believe their ideal candidate should be transparent regarding their financial background. 20% of voters had no opinion on this issue, and 12% felt that candidates had no obligation to disclose their financial backgrounds.
  • A slight plurality of voters (38%) had no strong preference as to whether their ideal candidate should be outspoken on matters of faith. 29% of voters said that their ideal candidate should be outspoken about his or her religious beliefs, while 34% of voters believe st their ideal candidate should not be outspoken about their faith.
  • The vast majority of voters (81%) somewhat or strongly favor a candidate willing to work with the other party. 14% were neutral, and only 4% opposed a bipartisan approach.
  • A plurality of voters (45%) see their ideal candidate in her/his fifties. 25% of voters said that their ideal candidate would be in her/his sixties, 18% said that their ideal candidate would be in her/his forties, 8% said that their ideal candidate would be in her/his seventies, 3% wanted a candidate in her/his thirties, and 1% wanted a candidate eighty or older

Anita Hill

In 1992, Joe Biden was the Senate Judiciary Committee chairman during Clarence Thomas’ nomination to the Supreme Court. Biden played a prominent role in Anita Hill’s testimony, when she accused Justice Thomas of sexual harassment. Recently, some have criticized Biden’s actions during the testimony. When asked about this issue, 36% of voters in Iowa said they disapproved of the way that Joe Biden handled the Anita Hill hearings in 1992, while 16% approved. 33% of voters said they were neutral or had no opinion, and 16% had never heard of the Anita Hill hearings. Looking solely at Democratic caucus-goers, 21% approve of the way he handled the hearing, 25% disapprove, 42% are neutral, and 12% have never heard of the hearings.

Caller ID

The Iowa statewide Emerson College poll was conducted March 21-24, 2019. The sample consisted of registered voters, n=707, with a Credibility Interval (CI) similar to a poll’s margin of error (MOE) of +/- 3.6 percentage points. The data was weighted based on 2016 voter model, age, gender, and region. It is important to remember that subsets based on gender, age, party breakdown, ethnicity and region carry with them higher margins of error, as the sample size is reduced. Data was collected using both an Interactive Voice Response (IVR) system of landlines only (n=424) and an online panel provided by Dynata (n=283).

Follow us on Twitter ​@EmersonPolling